Bombardier Q400 and CRJ900
Written on September 24, 2009. Written by admin.
Promotional footage. I’ll have the CRJ!
Duration : 0:2:34
Read more from the travel experience category. If you would like to leave a comment, click here: 25 Comments. or stay up to date with this post via RSS
Leave a Comment
If you would like to make a comment, please fill out the form below.
cool sounds !
cool sounds !
As an CAE with …
As an CAE with caribbean star airlines (now bankrupt) for 3 years. i worked on dash 8 Q300.
I find them over -engeneered and the steel/aluminum hydraulic lines/pipes a very stupid idea. Almost every month an aircraft would be but out due to these buggers.
the cabin air distribution motor also seems to work on low rpm or die after replacing it over 4 times.
software issues (landing gear doors closing before landing gear is retracted) and rubber door seals drying out in the humidity here.
ATR 72-500 vs Q400? …
ATR 72-500 vs Q400? which is better?
airlines you have …
airlines you have to blame
actually seats and …
actually seats and in perticular comfort, is the airline responsbility, I flew just 3 dys ago on an A330 then a 777 and on the A330 the seats were bigger the space between the seat in front of you was longer than on the 777 also the 777 makes a lot of noise compared to the A330 and we took off from a shorter rwy with the A330. but I like both aircrafts. But You cn only copare 2 constructers by the noise, the stability , the vibrations at all times of flight but not the comfort. Ther it is the
Q400 has the same …
Q400 has the same gate to gate time as a a jet aircraft when distance is under 450 miles. The bonus with the Q400 is that it uses 30 percent less fuel without sacrificing gate times.
its almost like …
its almost like that on every aircraft.
lol thats true
lol thats true
they could stretch …
they could stretch that thing another 5 times but you still couldn’t store your carry on bags in the overhead bins
Bombardier is the …
Bombardier is the best when it comes to aeronautics!
contd…
The …
contd…
The global express is one of the best aircraft of its kind. Bombardier actually owns the corporate jet market and can do very well. However unfortunately, revenues from this sector isn’t that great.
The Dash series are …
The Dash series are disappointing aircrafts although they are out dated de havilland successors. The CRJs have done a good job in the market. But bombardier doesn’t seem to have a bright future in the civil aviation sector due to the increasing competition other companies are providing in the regional jet market. I dont think there is any point of the C series. Sukhoi Superjet is already out.
that really didn’t …
that really didn’t have anything to do with the plane. That was because there was a scrap of metal or something left on the runway from a previous plane. It caused the tires to explode and it caused a gas leak and so on.
The CRJ looks like …
The CRJ looks like a stretched out version of the Global Express.
“compared to other …
“compared to other jets”
I was asking about the Q400. That’s the turboprop.. o_O
It’s a really nice …
It’s a really nice plane, I went on it about 2 years ago. I forget, but I think the seats to have either tray-tables or a pocket(one of those) It’s not that noisy compared to other jets but when you take off, it goes really nose high.
hahahah dont even …
hahahah dont even get me started on the big but fatal mistake of the Concorde SST. it was a super sonic airliner but the cons overpowerd the pros big time!
one thing i …
one thing i should’ve mentioned
McDonnel Douglas—> good at making aircraft with terrible flight history, (like the 90+ DCI plane crashes due to mechanical failure)
lol.
i still love the looks of the DC-10, but i wouldn’t wanna pilot one unless its history was a rather clean one. its very shaky.
true
true
I’m most likely …
I’m most likely flying in a Q400 in August! Anybody here been on it? If so, what’s it like for comfort? =3
I like both planes. …
I like both planes. I like the Q’s efficiency and I love the CRJ’s speed, handling, and personality. All of the CRJs have a bit of Bill Lear’s personality in them, and are a more nimble “sports car airliner” compared to the more massive (and also excellent) Boeings.
Bombardier: “good …
Bombardier: “good at doing DASH planes with landing gear which fails everywhere, anytime”
Well, I’d say …
Well, I’d say Boeing planes tend to be more comfortable. At least, that’s out of the planes I’ve flown in. I ended up really hurting my neck looking out the window of an A319 (it was at like chest height o.o). I dunno, I just find boeing more comfortable. =3
boeing –> good at …
boeing –> good at making good looking airplanes
Airbus –> good at making luxury airplanes
Bombardier/Learjet–> good at making private jets
Tupolev–>idk
Lockheed–>similar to boeing
mooney–> good at speed
cessna–>good with family airplanes/ training airplanes
De-Haviland–>good at adventuring airplanes.
xD
Difference between …
Difference between ATR-500 and Q400